MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903541671 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23411

Efficient preparation of nanoscale zero‐valent iron by high gravity technology for enhanced Cr(VI) removal

2018· article· en· W2903541671 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zheng‐Meng Wang, Dan Wang, Liang‐Liang Zhang, Jie‐Xin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsZerovalent ironPacked bedParticle sizeEndothermic processNanoscopic scaleHigh GravityChemical engineeringMaterials scienceChemistryContinuous stirred-tank reactorParticle (ecology)Nuclear chemistryChromatographyNanotechnologyAdsorptionPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Owing to its strong reducibility capacity, nanoscale zero‐valent iron (nZVI) can be widely used in the treatment of wastewater. In this study, nZVI particles with an average size of 14 nm were continuously prepared using a rotating packed bed (RPB) reactor with stainless wire mesh packing. The effects of the surfactant type and the rotating speed of the RPB reactor on the particle size of nZVI were investigated. The results indicated that the average particle size could be notably reduced with the proper addition of PVP in the preparation process. Meanwhile, the particle size could be further decreased by increasing the rotating speed of the RPB. Compared to a stirred tank reactor (STR), the RPB reactor had nZVI with a smaller particle size and a much shorter reaction time. The as‐prepared nZVI was further employed to remove Cr(VI) in the simulated sewage. The results indicated that lower pH, higher nZVI dosage, and higher temperature were beneficial to the efficient removal of Cr(VI). The removal process of Cr(VI) well conformed to a pseudo‐first‐order kinetic model. Thermodynamic studies showed that the reduction of Cr(VI) by nZVI was a spontaneous endothermic reaction process with increased entropy. In addition, nZVI prepared in the RPB displayed higher removal efficiency than the counterpart in the STR, and the removal rate was greatly increased by 17.4 times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.419

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsFrench-language works237,207