A spectroscopic study of a cyclodextrin-based polymer and the “molecular accordion” effect
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The formation of host–guest complexes was studied for two hosts: β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and a cross-linked polymer containing an equimolar ratio of β-CD and hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI), denoted as HDI-1. The thermodynamics of host–guest binding were studied with 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (1,8-ANS) using steady-state fluorescence spectroscopy in aqueous solution at variable temperature and ambient pH. The association of 1,8-ANS with β-CD and HDI-1 showed a fluorescence enhancement of ∼4 and 12 units, respectively. Greater fluorescence enhancement for the polymer/dye system indicates the presence of multiple binding sites (inclusion and interstitial). By contrast, the β-CD/dye system adopts trends that indicate the formation of well-defined inclusion complexes. HDI-1 has inclusion sites (β-CD) and interstitial domains (HDI) that afford dual binding with variable binding affinity. Simplified binding models employed herein address the role of inclusion binding without an explicit account for higher order or secondary binding equilibria. The approximate 1:1 binding constant (K 1:1 ) for CD/1,8-ANS is about two-fold greater over the HDI-1/1,8-ANS system. HDI-1 displays cooperative effects among the polymer subunits, according to changes in relative fluorescence intensity due to structural transitions and binding site loci. The relative fluorescence intensities of the HDI-1/1,8-ANS system relate to a reversible temperature-driven structural transition (globular ⇌ extended) of the polymer between 5 °C and 60 °C, in contrast to the β-CD/1,8-ANS complex. The temperature- and guest-driven structural transition, described as the “molecular accordion” effect, is supported by new insight provided by complementary fluorescence and 1 H NMR spectral results in aqueous solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".