MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903653238 · doi:10.5114/aic.2018.79877

Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?

2018· article· en· W2903653238 on OpenAlex
Krzysztof Bartuś, Radosław Litwinowicz, Artur Dziewierz, Bogusław Kapelak, Magdalena Bartuś, Randall Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Interventional Cardiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBypass graftingMedicineLigationArteryAppendageCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ENWEndNote BIBJabRef, Mendeley RISPapers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero AMA Bartuś K, Litwinowicz R, Dziewierz A, Kapelak B, Bartuś M, Lee R. Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(4):438-439. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.79877. APA Bartuś, K., Litwinowicz, R., Dziewierz, A., Kapelak, B., Bartuś, M., & Lee, R. (2018). Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 14(4), 438-439. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.79877 Chicago Bartuś, Krzysztof, Radoslaw Litwinowicz, Artur Dziewierz, Boguslaw Kapelak, Magdalena Bartuś, and Randall Lee. 2018. "Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?". Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej 14 (4): 438-439. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.79877. Harvard Bartuś, K., Litwinowicz, R., Dziewierz, A., Kapelak, B., Bartuś, M., and Lee, R. (2018). Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, 14(4), pp.438-439. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.79877 MLA Bartuś, Krzysztof et al. "Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?." Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej, vol. 14, no. 4, 2018, pp. 438-439. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.79877. Vancouver Bartuś K, Litwinowicz R, Dziewierz A, Kapelak B, Bartuś M, Lee R. Coronary artery bypass grafting after left atrial appendage ligation – is anti-inflammatory treatment after LARIAT effective?. Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(4):438-439. doi:10.5114/aic.2018.79877.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it