Multiple kernel representation and classification of multivariate satellite-image time-series for crop mapping
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multivariate satellite-image time-series (MSITS) are a valuable source of information for a wide range of agricultural applications. Image classification, one of the main applications of this type of data, is a challenging task. It is mainly because MSITS are generated by a complex interaction among several sources of information, which are known as the factors of variation. These factors contain different information with different levels of relevance to a classification task. Thus, a proper representation of MSITS data is required in order to extract and model the most useful information from these factors for classification purpose. To this end, this article proposes three multiple kernel representations of MSITS data. These representations extract the most classification-related information from these data through combining the basis kernels constructed from different factors of variation of the MSITS data. In the proposed representations, the combination of the basis kernels was achieved by using the multiple kernel learning algorithms. The efficiency of the proposed multiple kernel representations was evaluated based both on analysing the relevance of their kernels to the classification task and their classification performances. Two different MSITS data sets composed of 10 RapidEye imageries of an agricultural area were used to evaluate the performances of the proposed methods. In addition, the classification results of both MSITS using a single kernel were considered as the baseline for comparison. The results showed an increase of up to 14% in overall accuracy of the classification maps by using the multiple kernel representations. Moreover, these particular representations for classification of time-series observations were able to handle the undesirable effects in image data such as the presence of clouds and their shadows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".