MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903777307 · doi:10.3968/10628

“A Modern Man in the Trap.” Re-understanding A Farewell to Arms in It’s Historical Subtext: A New Historicist’s Reading

2018· article· en· W2903777307 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aminur Rashid

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoricismSubtextCrueltyReading (process)DreamLiteratureContext (archaeology)PoliticsVulgarityNew HistoricismHistoryPhilosophySociologyLawArtPsychologyCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper draws on the New Historicist reading of A Farewell to Arms . It argues on the protagonist, Lieutenant Frederic Henry’s experience of WWI and how he feels distanced from his root. He is haunted by the meaninglessness of his life. His bidding farewell to the war and elopement, though shows him a lead a good life in the beginning, results in futile ultimately. A New Historicist reading of the novel explores that Hemingway juxtaposes the social and political context in the novel. Making Henry in his destitute condition, Hemingway delivers a message of cruelty throughout. The peace he signs with Catherine is merely a part-time happiness that Henry thoroughly fails to understand. In short, Henry’s life reflects how Hemingway shutters the idea of association and peace when wars break out. That is why Henry meditates on Catherine’s death in Switzerland, where they find themselves out of all warfare. In the beginning, Henry is dominated by the spirit of the American Dream until it cracks down; secondly, by the heroism of WWI until he is physically injured and thirdly, by Catherine’s love until she dies. To Hemingway, he becomes short. In fact, the analysis finds out a modern man  in the trap.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.024
Scholarly communication0.0070.011
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicAmerican and British Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207