MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903887138

Chemostratigraphy, Petrography, and SEM Investigations of the Lower Triassic Montney Formation in Alberta: Implications for a New and Revised Diagenetic and Depositional Model

2018· article· en· W2903887138 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raphael A.J. Wüst, Sam Tu, Brent R. Nassichuk, Troy Bozarth, J. K. Tucker, Albert Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySedimentary depositional environmentPetrographyAuthigenicDiagenesisSedimentary rockGeochemistryPaleontologyDolomiteStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High resolution chemostratigraphy of the Montney Formation across Alberta identifies three unique and distinct chemostratigraphic units, referred to as CS1-3, with several subunits (i.e. CS1a, lb, 3a, 3b). The lowermost two units (CS1-2) are mostly monotonous, finely laminated dolomitic "siltstones" with low geochemical (e.g. element, ratio, factor) variability except for CS1b, where both sedimentary and geochemical variability is present. The overlying units (i.e. CS3a-3b) contains dolomitic siltstones with sandy beds that show abundant sedimentary variability, pervasive bioturbation and abundant geochemical variability. This study focuses on the lowermost units (CS la, lb, 2) of the Montney Formation in Alberta, deposited during the Triassic Induan Period and proposes a new depositional model that largely contradicts the current depositional models of a basinal turbidite system. Evidence for a new model are derived from geochemical, petrographic and SEM data. Gcochemical data (i.e. Si/Ii, As/Zr ratios, etc) suggest that the lower chemostratigraphic units (CS1-2) had minimal terrestrial influx and geostatistical analysis infers three distinct sources during the time of deposition, i.e. 1) marine benthic carbonates; 2) planktonic siliceous ooze; and 3) terrestrial material. Petrographic/SEM analyses of CS1-2 corroborate the geochemical findings revealing the dominance of authigenic minerals of quartz, dolomite, feldspars and pyrite, with few detrital grains of quartz, mica, feldspars and clay. Hence, the depositional model for the Lower Triassic Montney Formation in Alberta proposes a back-arc, semi-restricted shallow carbonate shelf with prolific benthic/planktonic shell productivity due to limited species diversity following the Permian-Triassic extinction event and limited terrestrial influx (varies locally). High benthic biogenic productivity suggests oxic bottom water conditions and possibly elevated salinity (to limit species diversity) that led to excess NaCl in the pore waters after deposition. Trace elements and total organic carbon (TOC) contents support oxic to sub-oxic sea water conditions, contradicting previous hypotheses of bottom water anoxia. Mineralogical, geochemical and organic carbon data also suggest limited influx of terrestrial and volcanic material. Since the majority of the CS1-2 sediments examined in Alberta display finely laminated dolomitic siltstones, diagenetic processes that generate dolomitic quartz-feldspar laminae from initial bedded shell debris are elaborated upon. A new proposal for the diagenetic pathway is based on findings from isolated carbonate concretions that demonstrate how in-situ porous biogenic debris (metastable aragonite, high Mg-calcite, biogenic silica and rare detrital and organic matter) can transform diagenetically during burial to "pseudo-laminated dolomitic siltstones".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University)Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207