MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903920861 · doi:10.1049/iet-com.2018.5654

Pilot decontamination in massive multiuser MIMO systems based on low‐rank matrix approximation

2018· article· en· W2903920861 on OpenAlexafffund
Muamer Hawej, Yousef R. Shayan

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Communications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsHuman decontaminationRank (graph theory)MIMOMatrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationMathematicsApplied mathematicsStatisticsMedicineCombinatoricsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In multi‐cell massive multiuser multi‐input multi‐output (MU‐MIMO) systems, the channel estimation performance is degraded by the pilot contamination problem. This effect occurs when non‐orthogonal pilot sequences are reused by other users in the adjacent cells. In this study, two channel estimation methods based on low‐rank matrix approximation technique are proposed to mitigate pilot contamination problem in time division duplex multi‐cell massive MU‐MIMO systems. In the first method, the massive MU‐MIMO channel estimation is formulated as the nuclear norm (NN) optimisation problem and solved by using a novel estimation algorithm proposed in this study. In the second method, the iterative weighted NN (IWNN) is proposed to improve the NN estimation performance. Consequently, the regularisation parameter of both optimisation methods is selected based on the cross‐validation curve method. The simulation results show that both proposed methods outperform the traditional least square method in terms of the normalised mean square error. Moreover, the IWNN estimation method demonstrates substantial improvement over the NN estimation method in the presence of strong pilot contamination problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207