MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903970986 · doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9297-0

Accretion in strong field gravity with eXTP

2018· article· en· W2903970986 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandra De Rosa, P. Uttley, Lijun Gou, Yuan Liu, Cosimo Bambi, D. Barret, T. Belloni, Emanuele Berti, S. Bianchi, Ilaria Caiazzo, P. Casella, M. Feroci, Valeria Ferrari, Leonardo Gualtieri, Jeremy Heyl, Adam Ingram, V. Karas, F. J. Lu, Bin Luo, G. Matt, S. Motta, Joseph Neilsen, Paolo Pani, A. Santangelo, Xinwen Shu, Junfeng Wang, Jian‐Min Wang, Yongquan Xue, Y. P. Xu, Weimin Yuan, Ye‐Fei Yuan, Shuang‐Nan Zhang, Shu Zhang, I. Agudo, L. Amati, Nils Andersson, Cristina Baglio, Pavel Bakala, Altan Baykal, Sudip Bhattacharyya, Ignazio Bombaci, N. Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, R. Ciolfi, Wei Cui, F. D’Ammando, Thomas Dauser, M. Del Santo, Barbara De Marco, T. Di Salvo, Chris Done, Michal Dovčiak, A. C. Fabian, M. Falanga, A. F. Gambino, B. Gendre, V. Grinberg, Alexander Heger, J. Homan, R. Iaria, Jiachen Jiang, Chichuan Jin, Elmar Koerding, M. Linares, Teng Liu, Thomas J. Maccarone, J. Malzac, A. Manousakis, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, M. Mehdipour, Mariano Méndez, Simone Migliari, M. Coleman Miller, G. Miniutti, E. Nardini, P. T. O’Brien, J. P. Osborne, Pierre Olivier Petrucci, Andrea Possenti, A. Riggio, A. Sanna, Lijing Shao, Eva Šrámková, Abigail Stevens, H. Stiele, G. Stratta, Zdeněk Stuchlík, Jiří Svoboda, Fabrizio Tamburini, Thomas M. Tauris, Francesco Tombesi, Gabriel Török, Martin Urbanec, F. Vincent, Qingwen Wu, Ye‐Fei Yuan, J. J. M. in ’t Zand, A. A. Zdziarski, Xin-Lin Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueScience China Physics Mechanics and Astronomy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsPhysicsAccretion (finance)Supermassive black holeAstrophysicsPolarimetryAccretion discAstronomyField (mathematics)Strong gravityGravitationGalaxyScatteringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueScience China Physics Mechanics and AstronomySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207