MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903972395 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aaedb8

Transformation of HST WFC3/UVIS Filters to the Standard BVI System

2018· article· en· W2903972395 on OpenAlexaff
William E. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWide Field Camera 3PhysicsPhotometry (optics)StarsAdvanced Camera for SurveysHubble space telescopeGlobular clusterAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Empirical transformations of selected broadband filters in the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Camera 3 (WFC3)/UVIS camera into the BVI system are derived. These conversions employ photometry of stars in a standard field in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae that has repeatedly been imaged with both the WFC3 and Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) cameras, enabling direct comparisons of photometry for large numbers of stars over a wide range of colors. The photometry of these stars on the ACS camera is used to define their BVI magnitudes, through the standard transformations from Sirianni et al. These BVI magnitudes are then used to define the conversions from the native WFC3 filter system. Results are presented for six WFC3 broadband filters: F438W, F475W, F475X, F555W, F606W, F814W. For these, convenient equations are given to transform (F438W, F475W, F475X) into standard B, (F555W, F606W) into V, and F814W into I. In a parallel study with the same database, a new transformation is presented for conversion of the ACS/WFC F475W filter into B.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207