MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903975555 · doi:10.1101/490805

A novel <i>qacA</i> allele results in an elevated chlorhexidine glu conate minimum inhibitory concentration in cutaneous <i>Staphylococcus epidermidis</i> isolates

2018· preprint· en· W2903975555 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amin Addetia, Alexander L. Greninger, Amanda Adler, Shuhua Yuan, Negar Makhsous, Xuan Qin, Danielle M. Zerr

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaphylococcus epidermidisMicrobiologyAntisepticMinimum inhibitory concentrationStaphylococcusGenotypeBiologyStaphylococcus aureusChemistryBacteriaGeneticsGeneAntimicrobial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is a topical antiseptic widely used in healthcare settings. In Staphylococcus spp., the pump QacA effluxes CHG, while the closely related QacB cannot due to a single amino acid substitution. We characterized 1,050 cutaneous Staphylococcus isolates obtained from 173 pediatric oncology patients enrolled in a multicenter CHG bathing trial. CHG susceptibility testing revealed 63 (6%) of these isolates had elevated CHG MICs (≥ 4 μg/mL). Screening of all 1,050 isolates for qacA/B by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) yielded 56 isolates with a novel qacA/B RFLP pattern, qacAB 273 . The CHG MIC was significantly higher for qacAB 273 -positive isolates (MIC 50 : 4 μg/mL, [range: 0.5 – 4 μg/mL]) compared to other qac groups: qacA -positive (n=559, 1 μg/mL, [0.5 – 4 μg/mL]), qacB -positive (n=17, 1 μg/mL, [0.25 – 2 μg/mL]), and qacA/B- negative (n=418, 1 μg/mL, [0.125 – 2 μg/mL], p=0.001). The qacAB 273 -positive isolates also displayed a high proportion of methicillin resistance (96.4%) compared to other qac groups (24.9 – 61.7%, p=0.001). Whole genome sequencing revealed that qacAB 273 -positive isolates encoded a variant of QacA with 2 amino acid substitutions. This new allele, named qacA4 , was carried on the novel plasmid pAQZ1. The qacA4 -carrying isolates belonged to the highly resistant S. epidermidis clone ST2 and were collected from multiple centers across the United States and Canada. Curing an isolate of qacA4 resulted in a four-fold decrease in the CHG MIC, confirming the role of qacA4 in the elevated CHG MIC. Our results highlight the importance of further studying qacA4 and its functional role in clinical staphylococci. Importance Staphylococcus epidermidis is an important cause of infections in patients with implanted devices. Bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG), a topical antiseptic, has been shown to reduce rates of device-associated infections, especially those caused by S. epidermidis . In S. epidermidis , reduced susceptibility to CHG is associated with carriage of the qacA gene. As part of a multicenter CHG bathing trial, we obtained cutaneous Staphylococcus isolates from pediatric oncology patients across the United States and Canada. We identified a group of isolates capable of surviving in higher concentrations of CHG and determined a novel allele of qacA , termed qacA4 and carried on the novel plasmid pAQZ1, was responsible for the isolates’ survival in higher CHG concentrations. The qacA4 -carrying S. epidermidis isolates belonged to the highly resistant and virulent ST2 clonal type. Our results highlight the need to understand the global distribution of novel qacA alleles, including qacA4 , and their mechanistic effect on efflux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207