MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903985551 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egy113

Mantle Upwelling or Plume Activity on the Periphery of the Warakurna LIP: Evidence from the Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of the Alcurra Dolerite in the Eastern Musgrave Province

2018· article· en· W2903985551 on OpenAlexaff
N Donnellan, Alfredo Camacho, Roland Maas, Richard C. Price

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryIncompatible elementMantle (geology)BasaltPetrogenesisMantle plumePartial meltingIgneous rockPrimitive mantleFlood basaltTrace elementLarge igneous provinceOceanic crustUnderplatingFractional crystallization (geology)Group (periodic table)Continental crustRare-earth elementRiftSubductionMagmatismEarth scienceRare earthTectonicsPaleontologyLithosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Alcurra Dolerite in the Musgrave Province, central Australia, is part of the c. 1075 Ma Warakurna large igneous province (LIP), which is interpreted to have been emplaced contemporaneously with intracontinental rifting. The Alcurra Dolerite in the eastern Musgrave Province comprises two types of continental tholeiite. Dominant Group 1 dolerites are mainly magnesian tholeiites, whereas subordinate Group 2 dolerites are normal tholeiites. These two groups have distinct chondrite-normalized rare earth element (REE) patterns, primordial mantle-normalized trace element patterns, and incompatible element ratios (e.g. Th/Yb, Nb/Yb, La/Yb and Zr/Y). Both groups are low-Ti and low-Zr, but Group 1 dolerites have higher Ti/Zr (>60) and Ti/Y (>310) values than those of Group 2. Group 1 mainly comprises olivine-microgabbros, and is volumetrically dominant, whereas Group 2 is proportionally minor and includes noritic-microgabbros. Dolerites from both groups plot in discrete fields in 143Nd/144Nd versus 147Sm/144Nd space, along a mixing trend between chondritic or depleted mantle and the c. 1·59 Ga Musgravian basement. Group 1 dolerites have low Rb, Th and K2O contents that preclude their contamination by Musgravian continental crust. They also have incompatible element ratios that overlap with mid-ocean ridge basalt or primitive mantle. Group 2 dolerites have more negative ɛNd values and are also the more incompatible element enriched group; they may have, to some extent, been directly contaminated by Musgravian basement. Low concentrations of light REE (LREE) in Group 1 dolerites indicate a moderate to high percentage of partial melting of a relatively depleted source. Mixing this partial melt with a small proportion of melt derived by a moderate percentage of partial melting of a more incompatible element enriched mantle source could have resulted in the low (La/Sm)N ratios and low absolute La contents seen in these dolerites. Group 1 is divided into two subgroups (1A and 1B) on the basis of LREE abundances and Nb/Yb ratios. These two subgroups may reflect different percentages of partial melting of the depleted source. Petrogenetic interpretations for the Alcurra Dolerite of the eastern Musgrave Province must address published geophysical evidence for asthenospheric mantle upwelling and underplating in the Musgrave Province, and for contemporaneous low- and high-Ti Alcurra Dolerites indicative of a plume to the west where they are associated with Giles Suite layered intrusions. The large proportion of probable asthenosphere-derived melt in the petrogenesis of the Group 1 dolerites from the eastern Musgrave Province indicates either substantial heat transfer, or significant decompression in the mantle. The Warakurna LIP could result from a complex interaction between a plume and mantle upwelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PetrologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207