L’écologie industrielle et territoriale : expérimentation opportuniste ou action collective favorable à une transition écologique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apparue vers la fin des annees 1980, l’ecologie industrielle propose un decouplage de la croissance economique et de l’epuisement des ressources naturelles au travers d’echanges de flux de matieres, d’energies, d’eau et d’equipements, etc. entre entreprises. Si, longtemps, les synergies industrielles furent decrites comme spontanees, relevant de la volonte de quelques acteurs industriels, les recentes recherches illustrent des demarches plutot planifiees et construites collectivement autour d’acteurs territoriaux, articulant strategies et ressources, interactions sociales et echanges techniques. Cet article propose une articulation entre l’ecologie industrielle et des enjeux de transition energetique d’une part, mais aussi son appropriation par des acteurs territoriaux. Au travers d’une analyse documentaire et une mise en recit de discours issus d’entretiens d’acteurs des synergies industrielles de Kamouraska (Canada-Quebec) et de Dunkerque (France), l’article renvoie a des determinants clefs de l’institutionnalisation de l’ecologie industrielle, mais aussi aux processus socio-organisationnels de sa mise en œuvre, capables d’en faire un « probleme public ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".