OS DESAFIOS DA FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES PARA UTILIZAÇÃODAS TIC NO ENSINO FUNDAMENTAL II
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Setor Educacional: EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL E FUNDAMENTAL RESUMOEste relato de experiência problematiza o desafio da formação de professores para utilização das TIC na mediação do ensino e da aprendizagem no século XXI.Parte da hipótese que, mesmo havendo um grande caminho a ser percorrido, é possível observar avanços significativos acontecendo na escola.Tem por objetivo identificar os fatores que distanciam e aproximam os professores do uso das TIC na prática docente.A fundamentação teórica está baseada em Kenski (2012), Moran (2013), Christensen, Horn e Johnson (2012) e Mattar (2017).A pesquisa é qualitativa e analisa os dados obtidos por meio de um questionário online respondido por professores que atuam na Educação Básica e participaram de uma oficina para o uso de TIC em sala de aula.Foram encontradas evidências que mostram resultados significativos ocorrendo nas escolas a partir da formação de professores para utilização das TIC
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.033 | 0.095 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".