Bibliographic record
Abstract
The subject of this article is the Condominium -an Association of co-owners of apartment buildings in Ukraine.Condominium is the legal term used in the United States and in most provinces of Canada.Commonhold is a system of property ownership in England and Wales.In Australia, New Zealand and the Canadian province of British Columbia it is referred to as strata title.In Quebec the term «divided co-property» (French: co-propriété divisée) is used, although the colloquial name remains «condominium».In France the equivalent is called copropriété (co-ownership), usually managed by the syndic.In Ukrainå and most post-soviet countries this term used as Association of co-owners of apartment buildings or homeowners association -HOA (ob'ednannya spivvlasnikiv bagatokvartirnih budinkiv -OSBB).Condominiums role is to work with the owners' corporation and executive committee to successfully control, manage, maintain and administer the property and to create an appropriate community environment and includes tasks such as: general accounting, budgeting, invoicing of levies/service charges, arrears collections, financial reporting, contract management, meeting preparation, communication with property stakeholders, coordination of maintenance tasks, enforcement of rules/by-laws, issuance of notices, orders and certificates, general secretarial tasks.Purpose of the article is to analyze the existing forms of housing management in different countries and to describe the current status in Ukraine.The competitive environment of this market segment in Ukraine formed very slowly, and his condition is quite far from the market-oriented.It can not be formed to market-oriented conditions without an active policy of local councils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".