Enabling Encrypted Rich Queries in Distributed Key-Value Stores
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To accommodate massive digital data, distributed data stores have become the main solution for cloud services. Among others, key-value stores are widely adopted due to their superior performance. But with the rapid growth of cloud storage, there are growing concerns about data privacy. In this paper, we design and build EncKV, an encrypted and distributed key-value store with rich query support. First, EncKV partitions data records with secondary attributes into a set of encrypted key-value pairs to hide relations between data values. Second, EncKV uses the latest cryptographic techniques for searching on encrypted data, i.e., searchable symmetric encryption (SSE) and order-revealing encryption (ORE) to support secure exact-match and range-match queries, respectively. It further employs a framework for encrypted and distributed indexes supporting query processing in parallel. To address inference attacks on ORE, EncKV is equipped with an enhanced ORE scheme with reduced leakage. For practical considerations, EncKV also enables secure system scaling in a minimally intrusive way. We complete the prototype implementation and deploy it on Amazon Cloud. Experimental results confirm that EncKV preserves the efficiency and scalability of distributed key-value stores.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".