MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904300405 · doi:10.3828/ajfs.2018.26

Robert Challe, adepte d’une anglomanie coloniale

2018· article· en· W2904300405 on OpenAlexaff
Driss Aïssaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian Journal of French Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractIn his Memoires and Journal d’un voyage fait aux Indes Orientales, Challe uses his experience as a traveller and settler to detail his visionary attitude to France’s colonial presence in North America. He shows how the corruption of the French political system under the Sun King, combined with the lack of determination of the French colonial administration, put his country at a disadvantage compared with other European nations such as England and Holland. Although a fervent patriot, Challe expresses his admiration for the English and Dutch colonial policy and urges the French to follow in the footsteps of their rivals to ensure the survival of their last possessions in the New World.RésuméAyant visité l’essentiel des pays auxquels la France avait, en son temps, étendu son empire, Challe-voyageur laisse dans ses Mémoires et son Journal d’un voyage fait aux Indes Orientales une sorte de testament où il déplore les revers de la politique étrangère sous Louis XIV et où il intente un procès aux autorités politiques de l’Hexagone qu’il tient pour responsables de la perte de certains territoires d’outre-mer. Marqué par un passé peu glorieux et tourné vers l’avenir avec un optimisme hésitant, il incite les dirigeants de son pays à sauvegarder les dernières colonies en terre d’Amérique en suivant une politique coloniale calquée sur celle adoptée par certaines puissances européennes dont l’ennemi de toujours : l’Angleterre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian Journal of French StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207