MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904313714 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2018.2883451

Nocturnal Epileptic Seizures Detection Using Inertial and Muscular Sensors

2018· article· en· W2904313714 on OpenAlexaff
Osman Salem, Khalid Alsubhi, Ahmed Mehaoua, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccelerometerComputer scienceGyroscopeSliding window protocolInertial measurement unitFalse alarmALARMConstant false alarm ratePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceReal-time computingComputer visionControl theory (sociology)Window (computing)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a lightweight approach for the early detection of nocturnal epileptic seizures through analysis of inertial data and muscle contractions. Our approach uses an overlapping sliding window to derive the variance of data acquired by the MPU 9,250 motion tracking device and single channel surface ElectroMyoGram (sEMG). The Exponentially Weighted Moving Average (EWMA) is used to forecast the current value of the data variance. When the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the forecasted and measured variances deviates from past values, a signal is transmitted to the base station to set the current counter in an alarm window. If the filling ratio of the alarm window is greater than a predefined threshold, an alarm is triggered by the base station. The proposed approach is intended to improve the performance of existing detection systems based on data analysis from Accelerometer. The MPU 9,250 is 9-axis motion tracking and used to detect motor seizures, and it contains a 3-axis Accelerometer, Gyroscope, and Magnetometer. The sEMG is used to detect silent seizures without jerky movements. Our experimental results on a real dataset from an epileptic patient show that our proposed approach is able to increase detection accuracy and reduce the low false alarm rate. Comparison with a Probability Density Function (PDF) further demonstrates the detection efficiency of our approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.762

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207