MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904317076 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23435

A novel modelling method for plate heat exchanger to predict the outlet cooling water temperature

2018· article· en· W2904317076 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuming Guo, Fuli Wang, Mingxing Jia, Dapeng Niu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSequential quadratic programmingHeat exchangerWater coolingFoulingQuadratic programmingHeat transferKernel (algebra)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper, a modelling method for a plate heat exchanger (PHE) is proposed to predict the outlet cooling water temperature. First, the mechanistic model of PHE is developed based on the theory of heat and mass transfer. The unknown parameters in the model are identified by solving an optimization model with the sequential quadratic programming (SQP) method. Then, to improve the output precision, a data‐driven model based on the kernel partial least squares (KPLS) algorithm is developed and added to the mechanistic model in parallel to compensate the deviations between the mechanistic model outputs and the real values of outlet cooling water temperature. With the PHE running, its performance deteriorates due to the aging of the device, fouling on the plates, and other unknown factors. Therefore, a performance assessment for the model is performed, and the model updating is carried out according to the assessment results. Finally, the feasibility and efficiency of the proposed modelling method are validated by application to the PHE in a circulating cooling water system. The established model lays an important foundation for the energy‐saving optimization of the circulating cooling water system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicHeat Transfer and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207