MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2904327785 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky404.413

PSI-36 Taxonomic and functional assessment reveals specific rumen microbial species and gene families associated with feed efficiency in Angus cattle.

2018· article· en· W2904327785 on OpenAlexaff
A. L. A. Neves, Kim‐Anh Lê Cao, Siddhartha Mandal, Thomas J. Sharpton, Tim A. McAllister, Le Luo Guan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyVerrucomicrobiaRumenFirmicutesPopulationProteobacteriaMicrobiomeBacteroidetesMicrobiology16S ribosomal RNAGeneticsGeneFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A greater understanding of the rumen microbiota and its function may lead to improved feed efficiency in cattle. The objectives of this study were: (i) to characterize bacterial phylotypes and microbial functions in the rumen of two breeds of beef cattle fed forage-based diets and (ii) to identify specific taxonomic microbial groups and gene families associated with feed conversion rate (FCR). Total RNA was extracted from twenty-four rumen content samples collected over four-time points (0, 80, 100, 180 d) from six purebred bulls (Black Angus= 3; Red Angus= 3) and sequenced (RNA-seq). Microbial classification and functional characterization of genes were analyzed using Kraken and ShotMAP, respectively. Sparse partial least square (sPLS-DA) multivariate regression models were used to identify a panel of bacterial species and microbial gene families (microbial signatures) that discriminate and characterize the different breeds. An Analysis of Composition of Microbiomes (ANCOM) was used to detect differentially abundant microbes and functions when FCR was adjusted to time. Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes, Verrucomicrobia, Tenericutes, and Fibrobacteres phyla accounted for 97% of the bacterial population in all bulls. Gene families were mostly enriched from ribosome, Calvin cycle, gluconeogenesis, glycolysis, and citrate cycle modules identified in the KEGG database. sPLS-DA detected 25 bacterial species and 10 gene families discriminating the two breeds. Specifically, bacterial taxa including Chitinophaga pinensis, Clostridium stercorarium, Ruminoccocus albus, and functions including large and small subunits ribosomal proteins L16 (K02878) and S7 (K02992) and NADH-quinone oxidoreductase subunit F exhibited a higher abundance in Black Angus as compared to Red Angus. Moreover, it was found that the abundances of Ruminoccocus albus and large and small subunits ribosomal proteins L16 were influenced by FCR and time across breeds, underlining the important role of bacterial composition and microbial functions associated with the catalysis of mRNA-directed protein synthesis in forage fed beef bulls.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→