MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904389094

Selbstreflexives Erzählen und die Dekonstruktion von Autorschaft in David Cronenbergs Naked Lunch

2017· article· de· W2904389094 on OpenAlex
Benjamin Weiß

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKODIKAS/CODE . Ars Semeiotica · 2017
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeConstruct (python library)ArtParanoiaAestheticsLiteratureSociologyPsychoanalysisPsychologyComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Naked Lunch (Canada/UK 1991, David Cronenberg) is a film based on William S. Burroughs’ infamous novel of the same title as well as on factual events of Burroughs’ life around the time of the creation of the novel. It serves as an example for self-reflective narration on at least two levels. On one more obvious level the narration focuses on the process of artistic expression through writing. One another level the process of narration itself is reflected by the film’s specific narrative strategies. This paper tries to show how these specific strategies (a major one is the transgression of the boundaries between different narrative levels) are used to construct or de-construct certain concepts of authorship represented by the film’s artist-hero. Cronenberg’s film thus develops its own position towards artistic production and to the process of creating art. Certain theoretical concepts on authorship as well as basic knowledge about William S. Burroughs’ life and literary themes (sexuality, drug abuse, paranoia) are essential for this analysis. As a result it can be said that authorship in Naked Lunch is shown as necessarily coming with destruction of self and others.Writing is described as work which derives from complex inner processes and physical experiences – both in some way drug related – rather than from intellectual reflection and rational thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it