Emergency case of spontaneous common bile duct (CBD) perforation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spontaneous or non-traumatic common bile duct (CBD) perforation in children is a rare condition leading to difficulty and delay in diagnosis and resulting in high mortality. Presentation can vary significantly. Patients usually present with sudden obstructive jaundice, acholic stools, and abdominal pain and distension. Treatment tends to be surgical, consisting of CBD exploration, and possibly, repair. We report the case of a 22-month-old female with spontaneous CBD perforation. She presented with a 1-month history of increasing abdominal distension, abdominal pain, and jaundice. On exploratory laparotomy, a large amount of bile-stained ascitic fluid was drained. She was managed conservatively with 3 weeks of external intra-abdominal drains. Follow-up at 6 months showed complete recovery. Due to the rarity of spontaneous bile duct perforation, delayed diagnosis and intervention is common. Physicians must consider this diagnosis in a child with abdominal pain in order to prompt timely surgical management for a successful outcome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".