MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904701617 · doi:10.1063/1.5062834

Experimental and theoretical threshold photoelectron spectra of methylene

2018· article· en· W2904701617 on OpenAlexaff
L. H. Coudert, Bérenger Gans, Fabian Holzmeier, Jean‐Christophe Loison, Gustavo A. García, Christian Alcaraz, A. Lopes, Anja Röder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la RechercheDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsPhotoemission spectroscopyIonizationAtomic physicsTriatomic moleculeChemistryAbove threshold ionizationSpectral lineMethyleneAdiabatic processAb initioSynchrotron radiationMoleculeX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyIonization energyPhysicsPhotoionizationNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsIonQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The threshold photoelectron spectrum of methylene (CH2), produced by consecutive H atom abstractions on methane, has been recorded using synchrotron radiation. The experimental spectrum spans the region of the X+ 2Πu ← X 3B1 ionizing transition. It is modeled starting from ab initio bending potentials and using the bending approach introduced by Coudert et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 148, 054302 (2018)] accounting for the quasilinearity of CH2 and the strong Renner-Teller interaction in CH2+. This first calculation yields a theoretical threshold photoelectron spectrum which is in moderate agreement with the experimental one. A more accurate approach treating the three vibrational modes is developed for computing the threshold photoelectron spectrum of triatomic C2v molecules. This new treatment is tested modeling the already measured threshold photoelectron spectrum of the X+ 2Πu ← X 1A1 ionizing transition of the water molecule. The threshold photoelectron spectrum of CH2 computed with the new approach compares more favorably with the experimental spectrum and yields an adiabatic ionization potential of 10.386(6) eV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207