Observed performance of three adjacent 48 m depth concrete diaphragm wall panels in silty soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The performance of three adjacent 48 m depth concrete diaphragm wall panels in silty soils is measured throughout the complete process of the wall installation including trench excavation, trench concreting, and concrete hardening. The analysis of the field measurement data shows that the ground movement induced by the wall installation is a function of construction activities. The maximum lateral movement occurs during the trench excavation. The trench concreting reduces the lateral movement. Field measurement at the end of wall installation may not catch the value of the maximum lateral movement. The ground settlement continues to increase during the complete process of panel installation, but with a decreasing rate. Roughly 90% of the settlement occurs during the trench excavation. The ground movement is also closely related to the properties of subsurface strata. The weak superficial fill materials sustain high disturbance, which consequently results in relatively large ground movement. With current engineering means and methods and good construction workmanship, the ground movement can be well controlled. In the current project, the maximum lateral ground movement was controlled within 2.0 cm and the maximum settlement was controlled within 0.05% of trench depth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".