MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904845127 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041017

A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis

2019· article· en· W2904845127 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum many-body systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyUniversité Paris-SudNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSemiclassical physicsLogarithmUpper and lower boundsOperator (biology)Hamiltonian (control theory)Exponential growthExponential function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a hypothesis for the universal properties of operators evolving under Hamiltonian dynamics in many-body systems. The hypothesis states that successive Lanczos coefficients in the continued fraction expansion of the Green's functions grow linearly with rate in generic systems, with an extra logarithmic correction in 1D. The rate -an experimental observable-governs the exponential growth of operator complexity in a sense we make precise. This exponential growth prevails beyond semiclassical or large-N limits. Moreover, upper bounds a large class of operator complexity measures, including the out-of-timeorder correlator. As a result, we obtain a sharp bound on Lyapunov exponents L 2, which complements and improves the known universal low-temperature bound L 2T. We illustrate our results in paradigmatic examples such as nonintegrable spin chains, the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, and classical models. Finally, we use the hypothesis in conjunction with the recursion method to develop a technique for computing diffusion constants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations350
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review XSame topicQuantum many-body systemsFrench-language works237,207