MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904862384 · doi:10.25710/bqk5-1n98

The Effects of Urbanization on the Water Balance of the Fishtrap Creek Basin, Northwest Washington and South Central British Columbia

2020· article· en· W2904862384 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles S. Lindsay

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural basinWater balanceUrbanizationGeographyHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyGeologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fishtrap Creek basin is located in northwest Washington State and south central British Columbia. Land use in the basin is predominantly agricultural. Moderate urbanization in the past thirty-five years has increased impervious surface area in the basin from 1.8 to 8.0 percent. Monthly water balances were derived in order to quantify the effect of changing land use on the discharge of Fishtrap Creek. Stream discharges calculated from these water balances, constructed for 1952 through 1953 and 1987 through 1988, compare well with measured monthly and annual stream discharges. The favorable comparison indicates that the water- balance variables are in general reliable. However, in months following long periods of dry weather, calculated discharge was much higher than measured discharge. The discrepancy is probably because the standard water balance method does not account for water stored in the vadose zone below the rooting depth of the vegetation or the time lag required for the water to infiltrate through this zone and into the groundwater reservoir. To interpret the results of changing land use on the discharge of Fishtrap Creek, a hypothetical water balance was calculated incorporating the climatic data for 1952 through 1953 and the land use as of 1988. In effect, climate was held constant while land use changed with time. The hypothetical water balance predicted that, as a result of changing land use, a 7.8 percent increase in annual stream discharge would have occurred if the 1952 through 1953 climate had occurred again in 1987 through 1988. Of this 7.8 percent increase, 2.7 percent is due to increased overland flow and 5.1 percent to increased groundwater discharge. The predictions based on the hypothetical water balance are supported by comparison of actual storm events. For comparable storms, stream discharge was higher in the 1987 - 1988 period than in 1952 - 1953.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.154
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207