Prevalence, Morphology, Embryogenesis, and Diagnostic Utility of Umbilical Cord Vitelline Vascular Remnants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study is to better understand embryonic vitelline vascular remnants in the umbilical cord, to assess their prevalence, to categorize their morphology, and then finally to describe and assess inflammation arising from these structures. During routine placental sign out, the author noted the presence or absence of vitelline vessel remnants for 1 year; when present, he assessed their histologic patterns and noted whether there were neutrophils marginating from the remnants and into the adjacent Wharton's jelly and whether there was any other evidence of amniotic fluid infection in sections of placental disc, membranes, or cord. All cord sections with vitelline vessel remnants were immunostained for CD15 to document any infiltrates, to highlight patterns of infiltration, and to evaluate whether mild cases of umbilical phlebitis were associated with these lesions and were at risk of being missed. Vitelline vessel remnants were present in 4.2% of placentas examined. There were 5 vitelline vessel remnant histologic patterns identified providing insight into the vitelline vessel circulation. Funisitis, primarily neutrophilic, arising from vitelline vessel remnants was present in 70.3% of the 37 cords with vitelline vessel remnants. The presence of vitelline vessel remnant funisitis documents continued active circulation in these vascular structures, and vitelline vessel remnant funisitis was associated with the presence of other placental histological evidence of amniotic fluid infection in 53.8% of cases. The author also reviews normal embryology and the pathology of vitelline vessel remnants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".