Prospective study of pulmonary hypertension in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors, and optimal timing of echocardiogram for pulmonary hypertension (PH) in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). DESIGN: In this prospective study, infants with gestational age (GA) <30 weeks admitted to a tertiary NICU between July 2015 and June 2017 who required positive pressure ventilation or oxygen therapy at ≥28 days of life were evaluated with serial echocardiograms at study enrollment (4-6 weeks of age), 32 weeks (only for ≤25 weeks), 36, and 40 weeks post-menstrual age (PMA) for PH. RESULTS: Of 126 infants (mean birth weight 858 ± 221 g; mean GA 26.1 ± 1.6 wks), 48 (38%) developed PH at any time during their hospital stay. The first study echocardiogram was performed at a median age of 31 weeks PMA. The prevalence of PH was 36/126 (28.5%) at enrollment, at 6/30 (20%) at 32 weeks, 24/111 (21.6%) at 36 weeks, and 10/59 (17%) at 40 weeks. No new cases of PH were identified at 40 weeks. At 36 weeks, none of the infants with mild BPD had PH, whereas 20% of moderate and 32% of severe BPD infants had PH. After controlling for confounding variables severe BPD (OR 3.31, 95%CI 1.12, 9.74), and ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) (OR 17.9, 95%CI 3.9, 82.11) remained independent risk factors for BPD-associated PH. CONCLUSION: Echocardiographic screening for PH can be safely restricted to infants with moderate or severe BPD at 36 weeks PMA. We identified VAP as an independent risk factor for PH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".