MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2904997479 · doi:10.1049/pbcs043e_ch9

Superluminality and detectable information in dispersive channels

2018· book-chapter· en· W2904997479 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmed H. Dorrah, Mo Mojahedi

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum optics and atomic interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperluminal motionGroup velocitySIGNAL (programming language)Pulse (music)Context (archaeology)PhysicsNoise (video)DetectorMicrowaveElectronic circuitEnergy (signal processing)Computational physicsComputer scienceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy exchange between an electromagnetic pulse and dispersive media may result in complicated, yet interesting, phenomena in which the group velocity becomes abnormal (i.e., superluminal or negative). For such cases, signal velocity (velocity of detectable information) remains debatable. In this chapter, we present a systematic study that can be applied to pulse propagation in any dispersive medium in order to quantify the detectable information content and calculate its speed, while accounting for pulse reshaping effects and noise generated in the medium and the detector. Accordingly, we present an operational context within which the constraints of superluminal signaling and its potential applications are shown. We provide scenarios in which the signal velocity is evaluated in microwave circuits with negative group delays and extend the method to include optical pulses in inverted media as well. Such analysis explores the fundamental limitations and capabilities of a broad range of superluminal signaling applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooksSame topicQuantum optics and atomic interactionsFrench-language works237,207