MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2905009721 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky404.687

PSIII-33 Nutritive value of soybean products fed to growing pigs without or with multi-enzyme.

2018· article· en· W2905009721 on OpenAlexaff
Julia Zhu, Ilona A. Parenteau, Elijah G. Kiarie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin squareChemistryPhytaseFood scienceXylanaseDry matterSoybean mealMealDigestion (alchemy)Soybean oilFecesAnimal scienceEnzymeBiologyBiochemistryFermentationChromatographyRumen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indigestible fiber-protein-phytate complexes reduce feeding value of soy products. We investigated effects of multi-enzyme supplement (MES) on standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of AA and DE content in expeller soybean meal (ESBM) and roasted full fat soybean seed (FFSB) fed to growing pigs. The ESBM was a commercial product and FFSB was roasted at 118–120°C for 75 min in a local farm. The CP was 42.8 and 33.4% DM in ESBM and FFSB, respectively and corresponding values for crude fat were 11.8 and 17.4% DM. Semi-purified diets with 50% of either ESBM or FFSB as sole source of AA were prepared without or with MES supplying phytase, protease, xylanase, β-glucanase at 1,500, 5,625, 270 and 70 U/kg of feed, respectively. Diets had TiO2 indigestible marker and ratio of cornstarch to sucrose and corn oil was identical to our published N-free diet to calculate DE by difference method. Eight ileal-cannulated barrows (BW = 22.1 ± 0.61 kg) were fed 4 diets in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square design (n=8). Period lasted for 9 d; 5-d for acclimation, 2-d for fecal and 2-d for ileal digesta samples collection. Fixed effects of soy product, MES and two-way interactions were evaluated. There was no (P>0.05) interaction or MES effect on AID and SID of CP and AAs, except AID and SID of Phe (P<0.05). ESBM had higher (P<0.05) AID and SID of CP and AAs than FFSB. There was no (P>0.05) interaction or MES effect on apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) except on CF (P<0.05), and MES effect on Ash and CP. ESBM had higher (P<0.05) ATTD of DM, Ash, CF, GE, CP, while FFSB had only higher (P<0.05) ATTD of NDF. In conclusion, MES had no effect on AID and SID of AA. ESBM had higher AID, SID and ATTD than FFSB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→