MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Spatiotemporal analysis for detection of pre-symptomatic shape changes in neurodegenerative diseases: Initial application to the GENFI cohort

2018· article· en· W2905072178 on OpenAlexafffund
Claire Cury, Stanley Durrleman, David M. Cash, Marco Lorenzi, Jennifer Nicholas, Martina Bocchetta, John C. van Swieten, Barbara Borroni, Daniela Galimberti, Mario Masellis, Maria Carmela Tartaglia, James B. Rowe, Caroline Graff, Fabrizio Tagliavini, Giovanni B. Frisoni, Robert Laforce, Elizabeth Finger, Alexandre de Mendonça, Sandro Sorbi, Sébastien Ourselin, Jonathan D. Rohrer, Marc Modat, Christin Andersson, Silvana Archetti, Andrea Arighi, Luisa Benussi, Sandra E. Black, Maura Cosseddu, Marie Fallstrm, Carlos Ferreira, Chiara Fenoglio, Nick C. Fox, Morris Freedman, Giorgio Fumagalli, Stefano Gazzina, Roberta Ghidoni, Marina Grisoli, Vesna Jelić, Lize C. Jiskoot, Ron Keren, Gemma Lombardi, Carolina Maruta, Lieke Meeter, Rick van Minkelen, Benedetta Nacmias, Linn ijerstedt, Alessandro Padovani, Jessica Panman, Michela Pievani, Cristina Polito, Enrico Premi, Sara Prioni, Rosa Rademakers, Veronica Redaelli, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Giacomina Rossi, Martin N. Rossor, Elio Scarpini, David F. Tang‐Wai, Håkan Thonberg, Pietro Tiraboschi, Ana Verdelho, Jason D. Warren

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversité LavalHealth Sciences CentreOccupational Cancer Research CentreUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersFP7 Information and Communication TechnologiesEuropean Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustAlzheimer’s Research UKEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilAlzheimer SocietyNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchMedical Research Council CanadaWellcome TrustAlzheimer's SocietyAgence Nationale de la RechercheUniversity College London
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaAtrophyThalamusTemporal lobePopulationNeuroscienceDementiaFrontotemporal lobar degenerationCohortNeuroimagingDiseasePsychologyPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brain atrophy as measured from structural MR images, is one of the primary imaging biomarkers used to track neurodegenerative disease progression. In diseases such as frontotemporal dementia or Alzheimer's disease, atrophy can be observed in key brain structures years before any clinical symptoms are present. Atrophy is most commonly captured as volume change of key structures and the shape changes of these structures are typically not analysed despite being potentially more sensitive than summary volume statistics over the entire structure. In this paper we propose a spatiotemporal analysis pipeline based on Large Diffeomorphic Deformation Metric Mapping (LDDMM) to detect shape changes from volumetric MRI scans. We applied our framework to a cohort of individuals with genetic variants of frontotemporal dementia and healthy controls from the Genetic FTD Initiative (GENFI) study. Our method, take full advantage of the LDDMM framework, and relies on the creation of a population specific average spatiotemporal trajectory of a relevant brain structure of interest, the thalamus in our case. The residuals from each patient data to the average spatiotemporal trajectory are then clustered and studied to assess when presymptomatic mutation carriers differ from healthy control subjects. We found statistical differences in shape in the anterior region of the thalamus at least five years before the mutation carrier subjects develop any clinical symptoms. This region of the thalamus has been shown to be predominantly connected to the frontal lobe, consistent with the pattern of cortical atrophy seen in the disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→