Combinatorial Utilization of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells and <i>In Vivo</i> Models to Study Human Congenital Heart Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We have established an in vitro model of the human congenital heart defect (CHD)–associated mutation NKX2.5 R141C. We describe the use of the hanging drop method to differentiate Nkx2.5R141C/+ murine embryonic stem cells (mESCs) along with Nkx2.5+/+ control cells. This method allows us to recapitulate the early stages of embryonic heart development in tissue culture. We also use qRT‐PCR and immunofluorescence to examine samples at different time points during differentiation to validate our data. The in vivo model is a mouse line with a knock‐in of the same mutation. We describe the isolation of RNA from embryonic day 8.5 (E8.5) embryos and E9.5 hearts of wild‐type and mutant mice. We found that the in vitro model shows reduced cardiomyogenesis, similar to Nkx2.5R141C/+ embryos at E8.5, indicating a transient loss of cardiomyogenesis at this time point. These results suggest that our in vitro model can be used to study very early changes in heart development that cause CHD. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".