MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905106967 · doi:10.1113/ep087268

Heat acclimation does not affect maximal aerobic power in thermoneutral normoxic or hypoxic conditions

2018· article· en· W2905106967 on OpenAlex
Alexandros Sotiridis, Tadej Debevec, Urša Ciuha, Ola Eiken, Igor B. Mekjavić

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
KeywordsAcclimatizationHypoxia (environmental)Affect (linguistics)Internal medicineCardiologyChemistryMedicineBiologyOxygenPsychologyEcologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Controlled‐hyperthermia heat‐acclimation protocols induce an array of thermoregulatory and cardiovascular adaptations that facilitate exercise in hot conditions. We investigated whether this ergogenic potential can be transferred to thermoneutral normoxic or hypoxic exercise conditions. What is the main finding and its importance? We showed that heat acclimation did not affect maximal cardiac output or maximal aerobic power in thermoneutral normoxic or hypoxic conditions. Heat acclimation augmented the sweating response in thermoneutral normoxic conditions. The cross‐adaptation theory, according to which heat acclimation could facilitate hypoxic exercise capacity, is not supported by our data. Abstract Heat acclimation (HA) mitigates heat‐induced decrements in maximal aerobic power ( ) and augments exercise thermoregulatory responses in the heat. Whether this beneficial effect of HA is observed in hypoxic or thermoneutral conditions remains unresolved. We explored the effects of HA on cardiorespiratory and thermoregulatory responses to exercise in normoxic, hypoxic and hot conditions. Twelve men [ 54.7(standard deviation 5.7) ml kg −1 min −1 ] participated in a HA protocol consisting of 10 daily 90‐min controlled‐hyperthermia (target rectal temperature, T re = 38.5°C) exercise sessions. Before and after HA, we determined in thermoneutral normoxic (NOR), thermoneutral hypoxic (fractional inspired O 2 = 13.5%; HYP) and hot (35°C, 50% relative humidity; HE) conditions in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Preceding each maximal cycling test, a 30‐min steady‐state exercise bout at 40% of the NOR peak power output was used to evaluate thermoregulatory responses. Heat acclimation induced the expected adaptations in HE: reduced T re and submaximal heart rate, enhanced sweating response and expanded plasma volume. However, HA did not affect or maximal cardiac output ( P = 0.61). The peak power output was increased post‐HA in NOR ( P < 0.001) and HE ( P < 0.001) by 41 ± 21 and 26 ± 22 W, respectively, but not in HYP ( P = 0.14). Gross mechanical efficiency was higher ( P = 0.004), whereas resting T re and sweating thresholds were lower ( P < 0.01) post‐HA across environments. Nevertheless, the gain of the sweating response decreased ( P = 0.05) in HYP. In conclusion, our data do not support a beneficial cross‐over effect of HA on in normoxic or hypoxic conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it