Mountain Building Orogeny in Precollision Hot Backarcs: North American Cordillera, India‐Tibet, and Grenville Province
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article I discuss the new perspectives on continental collisional orogeny from recent evidence that most continental subduction zones have 200‐ to 1,000‐km‐wide uniformly hot backarcs. Such hot backarcs are involved in most current and past continental collisions. I give the examples of the current India‐Asia and ancient Grenville orogens. (1) In continental collision, at least one side of the closing ocean has a backarc sufficiently hot and weak to be deformed by normal plate driving forces, in contrast to cool stable lithosphere that is too strong. Most deformation is concentrated on the subduction zone side of collision zones. (2) Precollision backarcs are hot enough to generate a ductile detachment in the lower crust, facilitating subsequent thrusting of the incoming stable continent under the upper‐middle crust of the backarc. (3) In hot backarcs there is a precollision low‐viscosity channel in the lower crust that facilitates lateral flow from beneath collision‐generated thickened crust. In continental collision orogenic belts, the high temperatures indicated by ductile deformation, metamorphism, and igneous activity are usually ascribed to heating by the orogenic process. I argue that the primary heat source is the uniformly hot backarc that predates collision. Most continental backarcs have temperatures of 800–850 °C at a 35‐km Moho, compared to ~450 °C for normal stable crust, and lithosphere thicknesses of 60–70 km compared to about 200 km. High temperatures that weaken the lithosphere may not be a consequence of orogeny but rather a precollisional requirement for most orogenic deformation and crustal thickening.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".