Investigations of the hydrogen diffusion and distribution in Zirconium by means of Neutron Imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Absorbed hydrogen degrades the mechanical properties of zirconium alloys used for nuclear fuel claddings. Not only the total amount of hydrogen absorbed in the cladding tube but also the zirconium hydride orientation and its distribution influence the toughness of the material. For instance, the so-called delayed hydride cracking is caused by the diffusive re-distribution of hydrogen into the dilative elastic strain field ahead of crack tips. The paper presents in-situ and ex-situ neutron imaging investigations of hydrogen uptake, diffusion and distribution in zirconium alloys used for claddings. An overview about results of in-situ experiments studying the hydrogen uptake in strained Zircaloy-4, as well as ex-situ investigations of the diffusion of hydrogen in cold rolled Zircaloy-2 and Zr-2.5 % Nb alloy depending on temperature, rolling direction and thermal treatment and of the hydrogen re-distribution in the β-phase of Zircaloy-4 during a Three-Point-Bending-Test at 600 °C are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".