MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905259247 · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2018.12.011

Five-year efficacy and safety of asfotase alfa therapy for adults and adolescents with hypophosphatasia

2018· article· en· W2905259247 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBone · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlkaline Phosphatase Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersAlexion Pharmaceuticals
KeywordsMedicineHypophosphatasiaInternal medicineGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialAlkaline phosphataseStatistical significanceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypophosphatasia (HPP) features low tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase (TNSALP) isoenzyme activity resulting in extracellular accumulation of its substrates including pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), the principal circulating form of vitamin B6, and inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a potent inhibitor of mineralization. Asfotase alfa is an enzyme replacement therapy developed to treat HPP. This multinational, randomized, open-label study (NCT01163149; EudraCT 2010-019850-42) evaluated the efficacy and safety of asfotase alfa in adults and adolescents 13-66 years of age with HPP. The study comprised a 6-month primary treatment period and a 4.5-year extension phase. In the primary treatment period, 19 patients were randomized to receive asfotase alfa 0.3 mg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC; n = 7), asfotase alfa 0.5 mg/kg/d SC (n = 6), or no treatment (control; n = 6) for 6 months. In the extension phase, patients received asfotase alfa (0.5 mg/kg/d for 6 mo-1 y, then 1 mg/kg/d 6 d/wk). During the primary treatment period, changes from Baseline to Month 6 in plasma PLP and PPi concentrations (coprimary efficacy measure) were greater in the combined asfotase alfa group compared with the control group, reaching statistical significance for PLP (P = 0.0285) but not for PPi (P = 0.0715). However, for the total cohort, the within subject changes in both PLP and PPi after 6 months and over 5 years of treatment with asfotase alfa were significant (P < 0.05). Secondary efficacy measures included transiliac crest histomorphometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). A significant decrease from Baseline in mineralization lag time was observed in the combined asfotase alfa group at Year 1. There were no significant differences between treated and control patients in DXA mean bone mineral density results at 6 months; Z-scores and T-scores were within the expected range for age at Baseline and remained so over 5 years of treatment. On the 6MWT, median (min, max) distance walked increased from 355 (10, 620; n = 19) meters before treatment to 450 (280, 707; n = 13) meters at 5 years (P < 0.05). Results for the exploratory outcome measures suggested improvements in gross motor function, muscle strength, and patient-reported functional disability over 5 years of treatment. There were no deaths during this study. Asfotase alfa was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events were mild to moderate injection site reactions. This study suggests that in adults and adolescents with pediatric-onset HPP, treatment with asfotase alfa is associated with normalization of circulating TNSALP substrate levels and improved functional abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it