MK4: PROGRAMA PARA SÍNTESE DE FUNÇÕES MAJORITÁRIAS COM ATÉ QUATRO VARIÁVEIS DE ENTRADA.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Com a evolu¸c˜ao da tecnologia e miniaturiza¸c˜ao os CIs (Circuitos Integrados) com tecnologia CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide Semicondutor) tˆem se tornado cada vez menores e mais eficientes. Para minimizar ainda mais os circuitos digitais, novas tecnologias s˜ao apresentadas, como por exemplo a tecnologia QCA, que em conjunto com a l´ogica majorit´aria consegue diminuir o tamanho de um circuito. Neste trabalho implementou-se o programa denominado MK-4 que tem como proposta realizar a s´intese de fun¸c˜oes majorit´arias com at´e quatro vari´aveis, utilizando o mapa de Karnaugh. A fim de avaliar o programa desenvolvido em rela¸c˜ao ao custo da fun¸c˜ao minimizada, os resultados obtidos foram comparados em termos de n´umero de n´iveis, n´umero de portas majorit´arias, n´umero de entradas e n´umero de inversores, com os resultados obtidos pelo programa Exact. Foram geradas todas as 65.536 fun¸c˜oes de 4 vari´aveis e o programa MK-4 foi capaz de gerar 43, 57% fun¸c˜oes de menor custo, 13, 97% fun¸c˜oes de custo equivalente e 42, 46% fun¸c˜oes de maior custo quando comparadas com as fun¸c˜oes geradas pelo Exact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it