The function of supplemental foods for improved crop establishment of generalist predators Orius insidiosus and Dicyphus hesperus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As with many biological control agents, generalist predators rarely survive prolonged periods of prey scarcity. Towards improving crop establishment of two major predators used in North America, Orius insidiosus and Dicyphus hesperus, this study examined the role of supplemental foods in achieving greater predator survival and faster development. In controlled environment trials, developmental time and survival were compared for predators offered diets including Ephestia eggs, Artemia cysts, Typha pollen, or combinations of these. Nymphal developmental time was significantly shorter and survival greater for both predators reared on diets that included Ephestia eggs. Interestingly, D. hesperus could successfully complete nymphal development on Artemia cysts whereas O. insidiosus could not, alluding to fundamental physiological differences between these predators. In greenhouse assays, D. hesperus was more abundant after six weeks when offered diets that included Ephestia eggs either alone or in combination with pollen or Artemia cysts relative to other diets. In contrast, only diets of Ephestia eggs, Typha pollen or their combination could significantly increase O. insidiosus crop abundance relative to the unfed control. Together, this work highlights important differences in the relative values of supplemental foods for generalist predators used in crop protection. It is also meaningful in guiding biocontrol practitioners globally in the rapidly growing sector of greenhouse vegetable production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".