MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2905427074 · doi:10.1093/jas/sky404.354

PSXIII-8 Metagenomics Analysis of the Healthy Feline Fecal Microbiota using Illumina Whole Genome Shotgun Sequencing.

2018· article· en· W2905427074 on OpenAlexaffabout
B DiSabatino, Adronie Verbrugghe, J. Scott Weese, Myriam Hesta, Moran Tal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFirmicutesBacteroidetesBiologyMetagenomicsActinobacteriaProteobacteriaShotgun sequencingFecesMicrobiomeIllumina dye sequencingMicrobiologyGenomeGenetics16S ribosomal RNABacteriaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The microbial community inhabiting the gastrointestinal tract provides many roles in animal health, disease, and nutrition. The microbial community’s composition and metabolic function has not been studied in depth in healthy domestic cats. In order to research, treat, and prevent diseased states further, a comprehensive characterization of the healthy baseline feline gastrointestinal microbial community is required. Fourteen healthy lean client-owned cats, 2–7 years old, with body condition scores of 4–5 on a 9-point scale, from Guelph, Ontario Canada, participated. Cats were fed a veterinary diet at maintenance energy requirement for four weeks. Fecal samples were collected at the end of the four week period, genomic DNA was extracted, and DNA was whole-genome shotgun sequenced with Illumina NextSeq500 platform. Data was analyzed through MG-RAST, a bioinformatics pipeline, to determine bacterial phylogenetic composition and metabolic functional capacity. The phylogenic composition identified four predominant bacteria phylum: Firmicutes (34.32%), Bacteroidetes (30.72%), Actinobacteria (19.4%), and Proteobacteria (10.37%). Within Firmicutes, classes Clostridia (20.55%) and Bacilli (9.08%) were most prevalent. Within Bacteroidetes, the class Bacteroidia (29.48%) dominated. Archea, Eukaryota, and Viruses were minor microbial constituents (2%). Major functional metabolic categories included carbohydrate, protein, DNA and RNA metabolisms (16.3%, 10.34% 6.07%, and 4.54% respectively); clustering-based subsystems (12.69%); amino acids and derivatives (9.22%); cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups, and pigments (4.69%); and cell wall and capsule (4.44%). Future efforts focused on providing deeper coverage of the feline gastrointestinal microbiome are warranted. These study demonstrate a need for further investigation to evaluate the effects of age, genetics, diet, probiotics, environment, and disease on the feline gastrointestinal microbiome. This study’s results will serve as baseline values for future feline microbiota research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→