MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905598301 · doi:10.32870/e-cucba.v0i10.118

DETECCIÓN DE ANTICUERPOS CONTRA TRICHINELLA SPIRALIS EN MUESTRAS DE CABALLOS POR MEDIO DE PRUEBAS INMUNODIAGOSTICAS

2018· article· es· W2905598301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miriam Susana Medina Lerena, Efraín Pérez Torres, Jorge‐Luis de‐la‐Rosa‐Arana, Miguel Ángel Pérez Ramírez, Yahaira Sarai Nuñez Avalos, Maria De Jesus Guerrero Rubio

Bibliographic record

VenueAvances de Investigación en Inocuidad de Alimentos · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBiologyMolecular biologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La triquinosis es un peligro de Salud Publica, considerada una zoonosis transmisible al hombre por consumo de carne de cerdo cruda o poco cocida con larvas viables de Trichinella spiralis, el caballo esta relacionado con la transmision al humano. La exportacion de Canada, Mexico y Yugoslavia de caballos puso en evidencia la importancia del consumo de carne de caballo infectado, al originarse brotes en Francia. El diagnostico clinico por ausencia de manifestaciones, puede ser subclinica y pasar inadvertida.  Los metodos directos como la triquinoscopia y digestion artificial; se emplean para detectar larvas, mientras que los metodos inmunoenzimaticos detectan anticuerpos contra antigenos de larvas musculares. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la presencia de anticuerpos especificos contra Trichinella spiralis por medio de pruebas inmunodiagnosticas (ELISA y Western Blot) en caballos en pie. Metodologia: Se obtuvieron 200 muestras de suero de caballos, el antigeno utilizado ensayos inmunoenzimaticos, consistieron en los productos obtenidos de excrecion y secrecion (E/S) de las larvas musculares (LM) de T. spiralis, utilizando la tecnica para determinacion de anticuerpos por ELISA y confirmando con la tecnica de WB. Resultados y discusion: Los 200 sueros de caballos resultaron negativos a las pruebas de ELISA y Western Blot. De los cuales 142 fueron machos y 58 hembras. Reflejando un estatus zoosanitario bueno y que no representa riesgo en caso se manden los caballos al rastro para consumo humano. Por otro lado las tecnicas inmunodiagnosticas para la deteccion de anticuerpos tienen una alta sensibilidad y especificidad. Conclusiones: Los caballos analizados para deteccion de anticuerpos contra T. spiralis en este estudio no representa un peligro en salud publica por lo que estos animales estan libres de triquina. Es importante que se inspeccione la carne de equino para evitar riesgos al consumidor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAvances de Investigación en Inocuidad de AlimentosSame topicParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207