Crystalline Keratopathy in Post-LASIK Ectasia: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report an unusual case of bilateral crystalline keratopathy presenting several years after a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure. METHODS: Case report and review of the literature. RESULTS: A healthy 42-year-old woman with post-LASIK ectasia, treated with long-term corneoscleral contact lenses, developed new-onset crystalline keratopathy in both eyes. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography demonstrated bilaterally symmetric paracentral rings of hyperreflectivity, involving the LASIK corneal flaps. There was good clearance of the corneoscleral contact lenses with no corneal-lens touch in all quadrants. There was no evidence of infectious or systemic etiologies. Genetic testing for the UBIAD1 gene for Schnyder corneal dystrophy was negative. Continued clinical observations have exhibited progressive corneal crystalline deposition, yet the patient has remained visually asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first known reported case of significantly delayed progressive noninfectious crystalline keratopathy in post-LASIK ectasia. The pathophysiology of this condition remains elusive to date and highlights the challenges of noninvasive diagnostic techniques and yet the utility of molecular genetic analysis in elucidating the etiology of this unique clinical presentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".