Nuclear Factor (Erythroid-Derived 2)-Like 2 Regulates the Hepatoprotective Effects of Remote Ischemic Conditioning in Hemorrhagic Shock
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) protects against organ ischemia/reperfusion injury in experimental and clinical settings. We have demonstrated that RIC prevents liver and lung inflammation/injury after hemorrhagic shock/resuscitation (S/R). In this study, we used a murine model of S/R to investigate the role of nuclear factor (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) in mediating hepatoprotection. RESULTS: The combination of RIC with S/R caused a synergistic rise in Nrf2 and its translocation to the nucleus in the liver. Increased activation of Nrf2 by RIC augmented heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) and autophagy and exerted hepatoprotection, concurrent with reductions in S/R-induced TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha) and IL-6 (interleukin-6). In Nrf2 knockout (KO) animals, RIC did not exert hepatoprotection, and it failed to upregulate HO-1 and autophagy. Further, resuscitating wildtype (WT) animals with blood from donor WT animals undergoing RIC was hepatoprotective, but not in Nrf2 KO recipient animals. Interestingly, RIC blood from Nrf2 KO donor animals was also not protective when used to resuscitate WT animals, suggesting a role for Nrf2 both in the afferent arm of RIC where protective factors are generated and also in the efferent arm where organ protection is exerted. Finally, RIC plasma prevented oxidant-induced zebrafish mortality, but not in Nrf2a morpholino knockdown fish. INNOVATION: Activation of Nrf2 is an essential mechanism underlying the hepatoprotective effects of RIC. Nrf2 appears to play a role in the afferent limb of RIC protection, as its absence precludes the generation of the protective humoral factors induced by RIC. CONCLUSION: Our studies demonstrate the critical role of Nrf2 in the ability of RIC to prevent organ injury after S/R.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".