MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2905814499

UCHL1 expression is a poor prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer

2006· article· en· W2905814499 on OpenAlexaff
Chang‐Qi Zhu, Suzanne K. Lau, Davina Lau, Geoffrey Liu, Ming‐Sound Tsao

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortStage (stratigraphy)Lung cancerCancerInternal medicineImmunohistochemistryOncologyPathologyMedicineCarcinomaBiologyCancer researchGastroenterology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1194 Background: UCHL1 is a susceptible gene for Parkinson’s disease and has both deubiquitinase and ubiquitin ligase activities. It is commonly overexpressed in a variety of carcinomas including lung cancers. UCHL1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and pancreatic carcinoma may also be downregulated by promoter hypermethylation. UCHL-1 is also involved in neural cell apoptosis. Materials & Methods: Quantitative-PCR (qPCR) was used to assay the expression levels of UCHL1 in two independent cohorts of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Cohort 1 consisted of 116 stage I-III tumors and 38 non-neoplastic tissues. The mean±95% CI of the normal was used to define the range of normal expression. Cohort 2 consisted of 172 resected NSCLC samples with similar clinical features as cohort 1. UCHL1 expression was also assessed in 10 NSCLC xenografts. Results: In cohort 1, 29.3% (34/116) overexpressed, while 3.4% (4/116) underexpressed UCHL1. Overexpression was more common in Stage I patients (32.9%) and in squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) (51.5%). UCHL1 expression levels were also higher in smokers (p=0.012). In stage I, UCHL1 overexpression was positively correlated with differentiation grade (p=0.014) and significantly associated with shorter survival time [HR=2.57 (95%CI 1.18-5.61), p=0.017]. The survival difference remained significant even in multivariate analysis for all cases [HR=1.05 (1.02-1.08), p=0.002]. However, it was noteworthy that the 4 cases (including 2 in Stage I) that had low UCHL1 expression succumbed to NSCLC within 3 years. Cohort 2 validated findings of cohort I. Survival analysis showed a significant association between UCHL1 expression and shorter overall survival after adjustment for stage and differentiation [HR=1.25 (1.05-1.53), p=0.03]. In NSCLC xenografts, tumor growth was positively correlated with high UCHL1 expression. Interestingly, although tumors with the lowest levels of UCHL1 expression (RVH6849 and A549) grew slower than those with high expression, they also grew faster than those with intermediate expression. Moreover, the expression of UCHL1 was correlated with higher tumorigenicity in an in vitro study. Conclusion: Overexpression of UCHL1 was more frequent in early stage NSCLC and in SQCC, and was associated with shorter overall survival. However, downregulation of UCHL1 also appeared to be associated with poor prognosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→