Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to review the contemporary evidence surrounding aortic bioprosthetic valve deterioration, with a focus on early failure of surgically implanted valves. RECENT FINDINGS: Structural valve deterioration (SVD) remains the most frequent cause of premature bioprosthetic aortic valve failure. However, recent evidence suggests that SVD represents a spectrum, and that clinically silent hemodynamic valve deterioration frequently precedes and predisposes to overt SVD. Hemodynamic valve deterioration is defined as an increase in mean transprosthetic gradient and/or worsening transprosthetic regurgitation on echocardiography. Novel evidence suggests that a dysmetabolic profile may predispose to this phenomenon. Furthermore, subclinical leaflet thrombosis is increasingly recognized as a potential cause of hemodynamic deterioration of bioprosthetic valves. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of systematic and regular imaging surveillance following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. SUMMARY: Early failure of bioprosthetic aortic valves is a complex and multifactorial phenomenon. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal timing and imaging modality for surveillance following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, and to establish strategies to prevent and treat aortic bioprosthetic failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".