Changes in IGFBP-2 levels following a one-year lifestyle modification program are independently related to improvements in plasma apo B and LDL apo B levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recent transversal studies have associated insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-2 levels with glucose tolerance and parameters of the lipoprotein-lipid profile. Here, we aimed at determining the longitudinal effects of a one-year lifestyle modification program on IGFBP-2 levels and to identify specific metabolic improvements impacted by the changes in IGFBP-2. METHODS: 99 middle-aged Caucasian men were involved in a lifestyle modification program consisting in personalized healthy eating and physical activity counseling, combined to elicit a daily 500 kcal deficit. Anthropometric and metabolic parameters as well as circulating IGFBP-2 levels were measured before and after one year of the lifestyle modification program. RESULTS: The intervention triggered positive changes in many metabolic parameters and a 43% (p < 0.0001) increase of IGFBP-2 levels. Subjects with the most substantial increases in IGFBP-2 also experienced the most important metabolic improvements. Changes in IGFBP-2 levels (both absolute and relative) were correlated with markers of body fat distribution and lipoprotein-lipid profile, and independently associated with changes in LDL apolipoprotein (apo) B but not VLDL apo B concentrations. Further analyses showed that for similar changes in BMI, waist circumference and visceral adipose tissue volume, large changes in IGFBP-2 levels were required to observe improvements in LDL apo B levels. CONCLUSIONS: The 1-year lifestyle modification program was associated with increased IGFBP-2 concentrations. Increases in IGFBP-2 levels were closely associated with reduced LDL apo B concentrations and independently of the modifications in fat mass and insulin sensitivity. Further mechanistic studies are required to assess the effects of IGFBP-2 levels on LDL metabolism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".