On the Performance of Grounding, Bonding, and Shielding Systems for Direct and Indirect Lightning Strikes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A full-wave solution method of Maxwell's equations is adopted for the analysis of the performance of grounding, bonding, and shielding systems of a metallic enclosure subjected to direct and indirect lightning strikes. The method is based on a numerical solution of the electric field integral equation by the method of moments. An array of conducting wires and metallic surfaces is used to represent the lightning channel and structures in its proximity. An improved antenna theory model approach based on the concept of the distributed source is adopted for the electromagnetic analysis of indirect lightning. The methodology enables an efficient electromagnetic compatibility analysis of a combined network of metallic plates, wires, and cables exposed to direct and indirect lightning strikes. The effectiveness of most common protective schemes-namely grounding, shielding, and bonding-is examined for cables located inside a metallic enclosure with apertures. A safety assessment analysis is performed for the case of indirect lightning and is compared to the case where the lightning current is injected directly into the top of the enclosure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it