MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2905913010 · doi:10.1111/lam.13109

A quantitative method to assess the role of indoor air decontamination to simultaneously reduce contamination of environmental surfaces: testing with vegetative and spore-forming bacteria

2018· article· en· W2905913010 on OpenAlexaff
Bahram Zargar, Syed A. Sattar, Joseph R. Rubino, M. Khalid Ijaz

Bibliographic record

VenueLetters in Applied Microbiology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContaminationHuman decontaminationGeobacillus stearothermophilusAcinetobacter baumanniiAerosolizationHEPAAerobiologySporeEnvironmental scienceMicrobiologyBacteriaBiologyWaste managementEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Indoor air can spread pathogens, which can be removed/inactivated by a variety of means in healthcare and other settings. We quantitatively assessed if air decontamination could also simultaneously reduce environmental surface contamination in the same setting. Two types of vegetative bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii), and a bacterial spore-former (Geobacillus stearothermophilus) were tested as representative airborne bacteria. They were separately aerosolized with a Collison nebulizer into a 24-m3 aerobiology chamber and air samples collected with a programmable slit-to-agar sampler. Settling airborne particles were collected on culture plates placed at, and collected from, five different locations on the floor of the chamber with a custom-built remote plate-placement and -retriever system. Experimentally contaminated air in the chamber was decontaminated for 45 min with a device based on HEPA filtration and UV light. The plates were incubated and CFU counted. The device reduced the viability levels of all tested bacteria in the air by >3 log10 (>99·9%) in 45 min. Based on two separate tests, the average reductions in surface contamination for S. aureus, A. baumannii and G. stearothermophilus were respectively, 97, 87 and 97%. We thus showed that air decontamination could substantially and simultaneously reduce the levels of surface contamination in the same setting irrespective of the type of pathogen present. Significance and Impact of the Study The innovative and generic test protocol described can quantitatively assess the reduction in environmental surface contamination from microbial decontamination of indoor air in the same setting. This added advantage from air decontamination has implications for infection prevention and control in healthcare and other settings without the need for additional expense or effort. Continuous operation of an air decontamination device, such as the one tested here, can lead to ongoing reductions in pathogens in air and on environmental surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLetters in Applied MicrobiologySame topicInfection Control and VentilationFrench-language works237,207