Study of morphology and mechanical properties of PP/EPDM/clay nanocomposites prepared using twin‐screw extruder and friction stir process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, PP/EPDM nanocomposites with 5 wt% nanoclay are fabricated by friction stir processing (FSP) and compared to the results obtained via a conventional twin screw extruder (TSE). Also, the effects of process parameters of these process on morphology and mechanical properties of this nanocomposites are investigated using Taguchi analysis. The prepared PP/EPDM/clay nanocomposites by two methods were characterized using X‐ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and mechanical property tests. Comparison of the results of these methods indicated that PP/EPDM/clay nanocomposite fabricated by FSP had a better dispersion of nanoclay and mechanical properties. The results show that by addition of 5 wt% nanoclay to the base material, the tensile strength and tensile modulus of FSP sample are 12% and 8% higher than the TSE sample. The TGA results shows that, the temperature at 50% weight loss for PP/EPDM blend is 382°C. While this temperature for TSE and FSP samples are 395°C and 406°C, respectively. Under optimal conditions of rotational speed of 1,200 rpm, traverse speed of 50 mm/min, shoulder temperature of 100°C and number passes of 3, simultaneous maximization of tensile strength (19.35 MPa), tensile modulus (643 MPa), impact strength (63 J/m) and elongation at break (101%) can be obtained. POLYM. COMPOS., 40:3306–3314, 2019. © 2018 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it