MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906030270 · doi:10.36805/bi.v2i1.273

ANALYSIS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENT IN EFFORT OF PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT ON MANPOWER AND TRANSMIGRATION OFFICE OF KARAWANG REGENCY

2018· article· en· W2906030270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBUANA ILMU · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployee Performance and Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman resourcesEmpowermentHuman resource managementQuality (philosophy)Work (physics)Knowledge managementManagementUnit (ring theory)BusinessOperations managementEngineering managementPsychologyEngineeringPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT
 The purpose of this study is to analyze and assess the implementation of human resource empowerment, implementation of work programs, inhibiting factors in the empowerment of human resources, inhibiting factors in improving the quality of human resources and efforts to improve performance in the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency.
 This research is expected to contribute to the development of economics especially in the field of management science; As a contribution of scientific literature in the field of human resources management, as reference material in scientific writing, as an information material, both for leaders and employees at the Departemen of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency in the implementation of performance-based and career management as well as consideration and input for decision making.
 The research was conducted by using qualitative method of single case study that is; Collect, present, analyze, triangulate and test the validity of data and make conclusions and suggestions. The focus of research in the field of training and job placement of the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency. Unit of research respondents: Head of Department, Head of Division, Secretary of Service, Human Resource Consultant and Human Resources Expert.
 Based on the results of the analysis, the following conclusions are obtained: the implementation of empowerment of human resources has not been implemented optimally, the implementation of work programs based on routine achievement, the factors that hamper the empowerment of human resources are the factors of human habit and discipline, the inhibiting factors Improving the quality of human resources is a factor of work culture that has formed from the first and efforts to improve performance by holding technical guidance of education and job training in the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency.
 
 Keywords: empowerment of human resources, performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.811

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it