ANALYSIS OF QUALITY IMPROVEMENT AND EMPLOYEE EMPOWERMENT IN EFFORT OF PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT ON MANPOWER AND TRANSMIGRATION OFFICE OF KARAWANG REGENCY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to analyze and assess the implementation of human resource empowerment, implementation of work programs, inhibiting factors in the empowerment of human resources, inhibiting factors in improving the quality of human resources and efforts to improve performance in the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency. This research is expected to contribute to the development of economics especially in the field of management science; As a contribution of scientific literature in the field of human resources management, as reference material in scientific writing, as an information material, both for leaders and employees at the Departemen of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency in the implementation of performance-based and career management as well as consideration and input for decision making. The research was conducted by using qualitative method of single case study that is; Collect, present, analyze, triangulate and test the validity of data and make conclusions and suggestions. The focus of research in the field of training and job placement of the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency. Unit of research respondents: Head of Department, Head of Division, Secretary of Service, Human Resource Consultant and Human Resources Expert. Based on the results of the analysis, the following conclusions are obtained: the implementation of empowerment of human resources has not been implemented optimally, the implementation of work programs based on routine achievement, the factors that hamper the empowerment of human resources are the factors of human habit and discipline, the inhibiting factors Improving the quality of human resources is a factor of work culture that has formed from the first and efforts to improve performance by holding technical guidance of education and job training in the Department of Manpower and Transmigration Karawang regency. Keywords: empowerment of human resources, performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".