MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906053468 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2018.8585995

A Microgrid Protection Scheme with Conventional Relay Measurements

2018· article· en· W2906053468 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiushi Cui, Shijia Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsOpal-Rt Technologies (Canada)McGill University
FundersMitacsHydro-Québec
KeywordsMicrogridDistributed generationRelayConvertersFault detection and isolationComputer scienceFault (geology)Renewable energyPower (physics)GridPower-system protectionScheme (mathematics)Reliability engineeringProtective relayControl engineeringElectric power systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of renewable energy and emergence of microgrid are reshaping the power industry unprecedentedly. Active distribution systems interconnecting distributed energy resources (DERs), including generation and storage, along their feeders create new challenges in terms of power system protection. Among other issues, most DERs are interfaced with the grid by means of power electronic converters, which have low short-circuit contributions. This makes it difficult to detect certain types of faults and to selectively isolate the faulty sections. The proposed solution utilizes data for applied intelligence in microgrid protection system design and implementation to ensure reliable protection under different microgrid configurations and operating conditions. It shows that detection features acquired from conventional protective relay measurements are sufficient for machine-learning-based prediction models in microgrid fault detection. A detection feature subset in each microgrid operation mode is suggested, meanwhile, the performance of six types of learning algorithms are evaluated in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207