MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2906161342 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2018.2889193

3D Parallel Fully Convolutional Networks for Real-Time Video Wildfire Smoke Detection

2018· article· en· W2906161342 on OpenAlexaff
Xiuqing Li, Zhenxue Chen, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, Chengyun Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersKey Laboratory of System Control and Information ProcessingFundamental Research Fund of Shandong UniversityChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSmokeComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkFire detectionArtificial intelligenceSegmentationImage segmentationObject detectionConvolution (computer science)Deep learningComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Remote sensingArtificial neural networkGeographyMeteorologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildfires have devastating consequences on ecological systems and human lives. Accurate and fast wildfire detection is crucial to reduce damage. The existing smoke detection algorithms using convolution neural network are mostly based on the classification of smoke images or patches, whereas the traditional smoke detection algorithms are often necessary to extract multiple features for integration. With the methods mentioned above, false positive is always an insurmountable problem in wildfire smoke detection. Moreover, there are few studies on the detection of wildfire smoke. Thus, to detect the wildfire smoke more intelligent, a 3D parallel fully convolutional network for wildfire smoke detection is proposed to segment the smoke regions in video sequences. Wildfire smoke detection is considered as a segmentation problem in this paper. There are more than 90 videos including various scenes used for training and test. Experiments have demonstrated that our architecture can segment smoke regions accurately and eliminate the interference of natural scenes. Smoke targets in multiple scenes can be detected accurately and quickly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicFire Detection and Safety SystemsFrench-language works237,207