3D Parallel Fully Convolutional Networks for Real-Time Video Wildfire Smoke Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wildfires have devastating consequences on ecological systems and human lives. Accurate and fast wildfire detection is crucial to reduce damage. The existing smoke detection algorithms using convolution neural network are mostly based on the classification of smoke images or patches, whereas the traditional smoke detection algorithms are often necessary to extract multiple features for integration. With the methods mentioned above, false positive is always an insurmountable problem in wildfire smoke detection. Moreover, there are few studies on the detection of wildfire smoke. Thus, to detect the wildfire smoke more intelligent, a 3D parallel fully convolutional network for wildfire smoke detection is proposed to segment the smoke regions in video sequences. Wildfire smoke detection is considered as a segmentation problem in this paper. There are more than 90 videos including various scenes used for training and test. Experiments have demonstrated that our architecture can segment smoke regions accurately and eliminate the interference of natural scenes. Smoke targets in multiple scenes can be detected accurately and quickly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it